-->

Google Fingerprint: How Google Understand The Shared Content On Social Networks?

A patent ganted to Google targets spam detection through a social network. This patent specifically targets spam on social networks and the characteristics of those only. That tells us it one of the characteristics of a social network focus on the search and identification of popular content that is shared on a network. Messages that appeared that allows popular with other members of the network, and allows them to see messages these trends. Scammers who have been allegedly taking advantage of the "large numbers of views of the comments of these posts receive."
Google Fingerprint
Bill Slawski’s article is particularly interesting clearly because it shows once again on how Google and possibly other search engines understand the content of social networks or the package Because of Its potential spam in a scheme in particular.

If the fingerprint does not match the fingerprint with previously stored, then the method Continues to post the comment on the social network. However, if the fingerprint matches the fingerprint with previously stored, spam detector has been identified that is a duplicate comment. This May be an innocent mistake or can be an Attempt to spam.

Besides the fact that is known almost everything can find out about the whereabouts of tweets, posts or soon then also an instant Articles on fingerprints, the question arises how search engines or Google with social content and their dissemination in the (social) web will deal in future, exactly?

Let's get anything before, who is as SEO at this point primarily on Facebook or its rather "inverse" spreading machinery, which could have a hard time in the future! Google's patent on a fingerprint method for identification of "social spam" may not be the most elegant way to end up but cause repeatedly spread by the same people content or articles, because of repeatedly "similar" fingerprints, eventually the "air" in the results of a search - in this case, probably the Google - is taken, Logical or not?

No comments